Facade; A False Front:
Hold your nose and close your eyes; here’s another dose of stark reality from the King of Simple News.
How important are esthetics? You know, what role does window dressing play in our culture? Well, apparently the energy savings and the green appeal of hanging clothes outside to dry are overshadowed by esthetics. The outcry against clothes lines has reached the level of lawmaking against the practice. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091118/us_nm/us_usa_laundry
The main complaint is that hanging clothes outside to dry is synonymous with trailer trash. And here some of my best years were spent in a trailer. “No one wants to see underwear hanging in the breeze,” said one dissenter of the practice. Well, not so much as you can tell it, Victoria’s Secrets runs prime time TV ads showing underwear on live models about every night. Michael Jordon and Joe Montana have a made a small fortune hawking Hanes underwear on TV. I guess that’s just not the same.
A new truck repair shop today is required to plant trees and put a brick façade on the front of their buildings so that the sensitive public doesn’t have to suffer the visual pain that truck repair is a dirty job.
Façade is defined as; “A superficial appearance or illusion of something.”
Superficial is defined as; “presenting only an appearance without substance or significance.”
That’s just the way we are, appearance is more important than substance and always has been. In the old west towns and mining camps, those constructing saloons, restaurants, hotels, etc. would build a wooden façade in front of a ragged tent! The façade fooled the patrons long enough to get them inside and that’s all it took to separate them from their money which was the principal idea to begin with.
Clothing companies put their samples on gorgeous women and hunks of men as a façade of sorts. Once you get the merchandise home, you realize that you look nothing like the commercial. But the ploy works over and over and over.
Much of our former mind game strategies are about to run their course. It takes money to build illusions. The cost of repair in the truck shop must be elevated to compensate for the cost and maintenance of the façade. That is why there are few facades in poverty stricken nations with the exception of government headquarters.
As Americans suffer declining real wages, governments at all levels continue to build marble laden monuments to themselves…they always have; Rome, Athens, Egypt, England, China, Washington D.C.. We are taught that these monuments extend to our individual pride of country and community. In reality, they are facades. Although, I suppose we should be proud of something that we paid for.
Inside these marble monuments, the inhabitants exist at the same elevated level as the architecture. We also pay for that privilege. Government never has and never will suffer the same ills of their constituents. We must keep up the façade that our leadership is special…kings and queens, democratically and duly elected to serve.
The extension of government royalty soon seeped over into our corporate elite. People with one brain and two legs reside in high-rise monoliths where the expectation of multi-million dollar salaries and bonuses is a given. This is also a façade without substance. No person with one brain and two legs can earn millions of dollars per year; however, they can steal it behind the façade.
Human psychology is truly stranger than fiction. Over the past years, we have suffered some of the worst government officials of all time, but rarely do we question their right to live well beyond the means of those who pay their salaries.
As millions of Americans lose their jobs, homes and autos, we don’t question the right for our leadership to drive new government provided vehicles, live in quality government quarters, and to continue the good life in perpetuity; unabated by the economic collapse that their very own policies created.
In fact, go to nearly any political rally and watch the people crowd forward just to shake hands or lick the boots of the next (or current) politician that is going to change their fate for the better.
I’m convinced that the path that we have taken could not have been altered so long as humans were in charge. We flourished and expanded in our wonderful unpopulated country due to our vast natural resources; right up to the point of overpopulation and using up those resources.
In the meanwhile, politicians and big business tycoons took false credit for our elevated way of life, that in stark reality, they may well have stifled rather than assisted, but…we believed them. It was nothing more than a façade with a ragged tent standing behind it, and constituted, “The Biggest Lie Ever Believed.”

Thanks for posting the article, was certainly a great read!
Humans seem to have a built-in preference for appearance over substance. For many, appearance seems to be all that matters. Until we find a way to overcome this basic tendency we will be stuck living with the consequences.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink. I guess it applies to humans as well.
I would like to be optimistic about our prospects for change, but our track record isn’t very encouraging. I guess we only change when we are forced to do so. I don’t think this is a case of humans choosing not to change, I don’t think we can. We simply lack the ability to do it; at least collectively.
Greg,
You said, “I guess we only change when we are forced to do so.” That statement is of course key to our poor planning. “What will we do when we run out of water?” The standard answer, “We’ll deal with that when we run out of water!”
And even then, forced change is nearly always temporary. Criminals will always promise to mend their bad ways for a lesser sentence, only to immediately re-offend.
Mike,
I always think of Las Vegas as the epitome of our culture. Fake buildings, fake boobs, fake people, all trying to get your money as fast as they can. When you look at it from this perspective it quickly loses its luster.
Mike…
I think this is relevant to your article today..
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/business/economy/22view.html
Wonder what you think of it.. Also, the whole article seems to be in the first sentence..
wma…
I liked the NY Times article from WmA.
It is possible that this line of reasoning or thought, could have rang true some time back (30s -40s), but with today’s vital natural resources depletion at record highs and climbing, job losses at record highs and climbing, I don’t believe this is a possibility. And if you throw into that mix, physics, the exponential function, well, the game is over. Severe resource depletion alone will not allow a feel good pull out of our deression or any deoression, but then severe resource depletion is in direct proportion to our exponential growth; therefore, exponential consumption. -bb
Wma,
The author of the New York Times piece is Robert Shiller, co-author of the Case-Shiller home index. It’s difficult for me to blatantly say that I know more about what is going to occur than does the esteemed Professor Shiller.
That being said, the most widely read article that I have ever produced is one titled, “This Ain’t 1929.” I pointed out the vast differences between today and 1929, not the similarities.
http://mikefolkerth.com/2009/10/20/this-aint-1929/
Shiller seems to be suggesting that Americans have money to spend…they just aren’t spending it. I disagree. Americans were losing their homes, cars and retirements well before we saw the official recession begin.
Shiller seems to also suggest that consumer spending would propel our economy back to the glory days of the past. I disagree. There is no such thing as a service economy buoyed by power shopping.
Shiller also has to be confident that the U.S. can manage $TRILLION deficits for the foreseeable future and at the same time keep Social Security and Healthcare on track. I disagree.
In final, since we all know that the vast majority of Americans are broke, Shiller is assuming that we can borrow our way out of this mess; that the public can service greater debt. I vehemently disagree. The U.S. has reached maximum serviceable debt.
Looking back at history is certainly a valuable tool; just so long as the present circumstances are taken fully into account.
Shiller can always say that he is correct. If the economy recovers somewhat, he can say that the attitude of the public improved. If the economy doesn’t improve, he can say that it was a self fulfilling prophecy of depressed public sentiment. Shiller can’t lose for winning. Perhaps Dr. Shiller should have been a politician or a weather forecaster.
Mike is right, optimism doesn’t fix flat broke.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/chgallsa.htm
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/delallsa.htm
Thanks Hutch,
To get a quick read on the charts that Hutch linked to, go to the extreme right hand column of each chart and scroll down to see what the norm has been for defaults and delinquency rates. Now scroll up to today!
Here is an article worth reading on James Kunstler’s site:
http://kunstler.com/blog/2009/11/courting-convulsion.html#more
There is an direct relationship between the untenability of one’s beliefs and the tenacity with which they are embraced and defended. Our fellow Americans will struggle to maintain appearances at all costs. Our culture equates personal value with one’s financial standing. We buy into to it from childhood and cling to it more stubbornly as we get older. For many, maintaining appearances is not merely an intentional deception, but necessary to preserving one’s sense of self-worth and sanity. The psychic damage of realising that the whole ball of wax is based on lies and fabrications is too much for most people to handle. Most will be dragged kicking and screaming into the new way of doing things.
And they call me crazy….
wordherder,
Thanks for the Kunstler read. While his descriptive language leaves something to be desired, his point is difficult to miss.
Once I totally grasped the very real and mathematically provable fact that America’s economy was impossible to continue, I felt as if I had discovered the secret to the universe.
At first, I thought that if everyone knew what I now understood, that there would be complete and unmanageable chaos.
I soon realized that the average human brain just ain’t going there. Tell them as you may, as plain and simple as you can, and their minds simply aren’t going to follow.
That is why I have come to the conclusion that there is not going to be a fix, but rather a continual decent to lower living standards. Specific actions create specific results.
I want to say that while James Kunstler is right on target, he seems to lack the indepth mathematical understanding of Capitalism as he states that it (Capitalism) is not to blame. That may be true in one sense, but human nature combined with unbridled capitalism are certainly to blame.
Here’s another interesting read from yesterday’s UK Telegraph: Société Générale has advised clients to be ready for a possible “global economic collapse” over the next two years.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/6599281/Societe-Generale-tells-clients-how-to-prepare-for-global-collapse.html
The article states that in the US the Total Debt is 350% of GDP !!! And we all know that GDP is an exaggerated number.
Here’s a link to the Entire Report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22776263/Societe-Generale-Worst-Case-Debt-Scenario-Fourth-Quarter-Nov-2009
Wow, looks like facades all over are crumbling!
Mayors from four U.S. cities said they are facing a once-in-a-generation fiscal crisis and that federal stimulus funds have, so far, been largely unhelpful in helping them balance budgets hit by steep drops in nearly every source of municipal revenue.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125866320178356259.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
Here’s more evidence supporting what Mike and those that visit this blog already know:
Payback Time - Wave of Debt Payments Facing U.S. Government
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/business/23rates.html?_r=1
George, This must be the annual day to look behind the facades, here is a link to an article that warns that the trouble for the banks is far from over…
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Bank-crisis-shows-need-to-rb-3341160970.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=
Regarding the link in message number 17. When a highly regarded and respected consulting firm, Watson Wyatt, starts taking about depression, wars and the end of capitalism, even if it is just a laundry list of potential risks, it is time to pack the van and head for the hills. Enjoy the ride.
Greg,
I agree, when these guys all start hedging their bet, it’s much worse than one would care to know. No investment firm wants to be the last one to say, “Just hang in there and keep on investing, everything is gonna be hokey-dokey.”